COVID-19: Virus, asesinos y estrategias


Os traigo y recomiendo la lectura del último artículo escrito por Máximo Sandín Domínguez, de Abril de 2020. Doctor en Ciencias Biológicas y en Bioantropología.

Coronavirus: sobre virus, asesinos y estrategias.

Parece una obviedad afirmar que la crisis mundial que se ha desatado como consecuencia de la pandemia producida por el covid 19 no tiene precedentes en la historia. Lo que no es tan evidente es porqué si esta pandemia se produce como se afirma desde el ámbito científico, es decir, por el “salto” espontáneo del virus de algún animal al hombre, no se han producido continuamente epidemias de origen viral a lo lago de la historia.

En cualquier caso, esta situación ha originado un consenso social sobre las causas y consecuencias de la “aparición del coronavirus” generado por una abrumadora y permanente avalancha de información por parte de todos los medios de comunicación. Los expertos, que aportan la voz de la Ciencia, nos hablan de un “virus asesino” pero que utiliza una perversa “estrategia”: no matar a todos los que infecta para poder seguir reproduciéndose.

Sin embargo, la atribución de cualidades, incluso de intenciones a un ente biológico que en estado libre es inerte, a una molécula de ADN o (en este caso) de ARN empaquetado con una densidad casi cristalina en una cápsida proteica envuelta en una capa de lípidos, un ente que no se puede considerar un ser vivo, produce una cierta desconfianza en estas interpretaciones científicas por muy prestigiosos que sean sus emisores. Pero lo que lleva la desconfianza al límite de la sospecha es cuando la prestigiosa revista científica Nature (Nature Medicine 17 de marzo) publica un artículo en el que concluye que el virus covid 19 “no es un virus obtenido en un laboratorio o manipulado a propósito”, un estupor que puede equivaler al producido porque en una revista de astrofísica se publicase un artículo destinado a demostrar que la Tierra no es plana.

Siga leyendo el artículo aquí.

Este artículo avala varias teorías que desencadenan en una, que a la vez se abre en racimos.

Os dejo también la web del Doctor Sandín: Somos bacterias y virus.

I bring you and recommend reading the last article written by Máximo Sandín Domínguez on April 2020. Doctor in Biological Sciences and Bioanthropology.

This article endorses several theories that trigger one, which at the same time opens in clusters.

Coronavirus: about viruses, killers and strategies.

Máximo Sandín.

It seems obvious that the world crisis that has been unleashed as a consequence of the pandemic caused by the covid 19 is unprecedented in history. What is not so evident is why if this pandemic occurs as claimed from the scientific field, that is, by the spontaneous “jump” of the virus from an animal to man, there have not been continuous epidemics of viral origin to the lake of history.
In any case, this situation has given rise to a social consensus on the causes and consequences of the “appearance of the coronavirus” generated by an overwhelming and permanent avalanche of information by all the media. The experts, who contribute the voice of Science, tell us about a “murderous virus” but that uses a perverse “strategy”: not to kill everyone it infects in order to continue reproducing.
However, the attribution of qualities, even of intentions, to a biological entity that is inert in the free state, to a DNA molecule or (in this case) RNA packed with an almost crystalline density in a protein casid wrapped in a layer of Lipids, an entity that cannot be considered a living being, produces a certain distrust in these scientific interpretations, however prestigious their emitters may be. But what brings mistrust to the limit of suspicion is when the prestigious scientific journal Nature (Nature Medicine March 17) publishes an article in which it concludes that the covid 19 virus “is not a virus obtained in a laboratory or manipulated on purpose ”, A stupor that can be equivalent to that produced because an article was published in an astrophysics magazine to demonstrate that the Earth is not flat.

The question that arises is why is such a prestigious magazine dedicated to contradicting a supposed infusion that should not even be taken into account scientifically because it comes from the field of what is usually described as “conspiranoic”?
Although in the current situation it may not seem appropriate to question official information, given that the priority is to end the pandemic, it never hurts (it may be essential) to understand why it occurred, so I suggest to the reader that I Join us to try to dispel these concerns by resorting to scientific data, that is, not interpretations, that allow us to get an idea of ​​what is happening.
The information that reaches the general public is based, fundamentally, on explanations and opinions of experts that are supposed to be believed on the basis of the principle of authority. In our case, I want the reader to draw his own conclusions from the data that I am going to present. In order to facilitate this work, I am not going to use bibliographic references that make it necessary to verify the affirmations by looking for the cited articles, but, directly, by copying the covers of those articles. (For the covers, go to the original pdf).

Let’s see then: The number of bacteria on Earth has been calculated to be approximately one nonillion (that is, one followed by thirty zeros). Well, it is estimated that the number of viruses is between five and twenty-five times the number of bacteria. As you will see, viruses or entities like viruses ”have played an important role in the evolution of life. But this is a long story. We will limit ourselves in this case to its ecological function:

Up to 10 billion viruses per liter have been counted in surface marine waters. Its function is to control the base of the marine trophic network. Since viruses are inert and passively move, when colonies of bacteria and algae grow excessively, being able to prevent the passage of the sun’s rays to the seabed, viruses destroy them until their density makes it possible for them to pass. Sun rays. Incidentally, the sulfurous products derived from this process contribute to the nucleation of the clouds.
Let’s see on the floors (excuse the size of the letters):

In the soils their number is variable, in all astronomical cases. In this study they have shown average figures of 5.3-10e8 and they are also involved in the control of bacterial communities.
Regarding its presence in organisms, it is considered that 10% of the human genome is made up of endogenous retroviruses, that is, viruses that throughout their evolution have inserted their gene sequences into our genome. But if we take into account the sequences derived from viruses (mobile elements such as transposons and retrotrasposons, repeated short and long elements, introns …) we find that the vast majority of our genomes are made up of viruses and their derivatives that control the expression of protein coding genes.

But, what is more, what was considered the genome, that is, the protein coding genes, which constitute 1.5% of the entire genome, is made up of viruses and their derivatives:

As a curiosity, in case it is interesting to someone, I will point out that in this article the candid author does not explain why the genome sequences derived from viruses are removed “by someone” from public databases:

But our organism not only contains viruses in the form of sequences inserted into the chromosomes. The number of complete viruses that perform essential functions for our organism is of such a size that it surprises the researchers themselves. Billions (rather billions) of bacterial viruses coexist with the billions of bacteria in our intestinal tract that are essential to our lives. Bacteriophages or phages regulate bacterial populations and exchange genetic information between them. That is, viruses control bacteria that control our body.
Any other viruses? Let’s see:

A huge number of bacteriophages attached to the mucosa of the body prevent external bacteria from penetrating, which should not be there, that is, they also protect our body.
If I have an opinion, it seems like something has been wrong with the viruses. With the condition of the viruses when they were discovered associated with diseases. But, let’s look at some of those associations:

According to this article, breast cancer emits retroviral particles. Endogenous viruses are known to be able to jump out of the genome in the face of some form of environmental aggression. That is why, on many occasions, viruses have been identified as the causative agent of different diseases when in reality they are a consequence. And that is why, in the diseased tissues, the presence of viral particles is observed.

And thus, a viral origin has been suggested for diseases such as arthritis or schizophrenia, despite the fact that an epidemic of these diseases has never been reported.

Endogenous viruses have long been known to be expressed as a constituent of genomes, that is, they are the genome. This fact is of great importance for the subject at hand. Endogenous retroviruses or parts of them are expressed in such important processes as production of fundamental enzymes or the formation of the placenta during pregnancy.

These findings tell us about the fundamental role that viruses play in life processes, but what is the relationship of these phenomena to the subject at hand? We will see that it is a relationship of enormous importance, so I ask you to pay the most attention to the following two articles:

A multitude of endogenous retroviruses are expressed (involved in development) in embryonic tissues. As you can see, they are expressed in the placenta, adrenal cortex, kidneys, tongue, heart, liver, and central nervous system, as well as in the rest of the tissues. But let’s see in adult tissues:

In normal adult individuals, endogenous retroviruses are expressed in all tissues confirming that they are permanent components of the human transcriptome.

And now, let’s see how certain vaccines have been manufactured:

On the website of the INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND MANUFATURERS & ASSOCIATIONS the following information was very proud:

Do not look for it, because it has disappeared from the web. And for good reason, because cultivating human viruses in embryos of other animals in which a multitude of endogenous viruses are expressed, leads to hybridizations with their corresponding viruses, which produces infectious viruses with characteristics different from the original ones.
We have long been informed that seasonal flu came “from birds” and that it “mutated” each year, quite possibly with the development of each new vaccine. With each new hybridization.
For example, in this yellow fever vaccine:

These terrible consequences of dangerous practices can be considered the result of ignorance of relatively recent discoveries. Therefore, unintentional. Let me explain some practices carried out with perfect knowledge of what was being done and that I leave to your interpretation:

Perhaps the reader wonders what is the point of resuscitating a virus that caused nearly fifty million deaths? A virus that did not “emerge” in Spain, despite the fact that it was called “Spanish flu” with the intention of concealing the mortality it caused in soldiers at the end of the First World War, because in our country the state of epidemic was declared .
But its origin was, apparently, in the American soldiers. Some time ago I came across this information that, despite not coming from “official” channels, is consistent with what we have seen previously;

If this is the case, it would be the result of the ignorance of the existing viruses in the substrates and of the methods used to make vaccines, which in the case of the initial ones were very rudimentary and dangerous.
But in the following case, it is evident that it is not ignorance. The excuse that it is a question of determining its virulence is not credible. The two previous pandemic outbreaks that did not become pandemic were those caused by “bird flu” or H5N1, which resulted in high mortality but was difficult to transmit, and then H1N1 “swine flu”, which was easily transmitted but not very virulent. The letters H and N refer to hematoglutinin, a protein that is a component of the blood clotting system, and to neuramidase, an enzyme that controls the formation and maintenance of the myelin sheath of neurons, which form the virus virus capsid. flu.
And now an innocent experiment:

Let’s take a closer look at the consequences of this “experiment”:

It turns out that the characteristics of the porcine virus (H1N1) have a high antigenic similarity ”with the reconstructed human virus 1918 (H1N1). The explanation is that they “possibly share a common ancestor” as if viruses were going around the world getting married (or forming common-law partners).
The explanations for the “appearance” of the covid 19 are of the same scientific level: “It probably passed from a pangolin to the man through a bat, but it is not certain …” I hope that the reader has enough data to deduce another form of “appearance ”Of the coronavirus.
Well: there seems to be enough information to understand how covid 19 was produced. About the authors and their intentions you will have to investigate.

Villalbilla, April 2020

I also leave here the website of Doctor Sandín: We are bacteria and viruses.







Voy a intentar sintetizar lo que expongo en anteriores escritos. Nunca los vuelvo a leer, y créanme, a veces ni me acuerdo de lo que escribo, pero la base, los puntos cardinales, siguen ahí.

  1. El SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) ha podido ser manipulado en un laboratorio. O no. Da igual, es lo de menos. Si te voy a lanzar una bomba atómica y se fehacientemente que te va a caer un meteorito de forma natural, espero a que la naturaleza me haga las cosas más fáciles. De esta forma no hay ni criminales ni testigos.
  2. La deuda mundial es impagable. La élite de la élite (los políticos no saben nada, si ocultan algo es la típica opacidad gubernamental digamos, de segundo o tercer nivel) tienen que cambiar el juego para seguir funcionando con nuevas reglas y nuevo escenario.
  3. En estado de shock necesitamos “vacunas” mentales, en plural, somos más manipulables y encajamos las piezas que nos manden como el mejor jugador de Tetris.
  4. No sabemos qué pasará. Lo aceptaremos, o no. Y las consecuencias de ambos actos.

Con estos cuatro puntos ya se puede jugar al monopolio. Hay dinero, cosas que comprar y gente que expulsar. rosa_de_los_vientos_2

Puede que el punto 1 y el 2 no estén interconectados en un principio pero se da una ósmosis que absorben en cascada a los cuatro en uno solo. En una rosa, la de los vientos. Frescos.

De momento tomen el sol durante 20 minutos, vitaminas C y D.



I am going to try to synthesize what I expose in previous writings. I never read them again, and believe me, sometimes I don’t even remember what I write, but the base, the cardinal points, are still there.
1) SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) has been manipulated in a laboratory. Or not. Never mind, it’s the least of it. If I am going to drop an atomic bomb on you and I know that a meteor is going to fall naturally, I hope that nature makes things easier for me. In this way there are neither criminals nor witnesses.
2) World debt is unpayable. The elite of the elite (politicians don’t know anything, if they hide something is the typical government opacity, let’s say, second or third level) they have to change the game to continue operating with new rules and a new scenario.
3) In shock we need mental “shots”, in the plural, we are more manipulable and we fit the pieces that send us as the best Tetris player.
4) We don’t know what will happen. We will accept it or not. And the consequences of both acts.
With these four points you can already play monopoly. There is money, things to buy and people to expel.
Point 1 and 2 may not be interconnected at first, but an osmosis occurs that cascades absorb all four into one. In a rose, that of the winds. Fresh.

At the moment sunbathe for 20 minutes, vitamins C and D.





No fue hasta ayer. Pero mañana también. Hoy fue y será. La verja ya estará allí, y estaba. Atrás una casona del XIX. Yo en el jardín frente a mi, una verja, no la verja.

Medio escondido en el pasado y las flores serpentinas de la verja en pie, no me dejaban sentir con los ojos el presente de lo que pasará. Admiraba pasos, paseantes escondidos, furtivos, clandestinos ante yo. Entonces claras, cristalinas y opacas coloridas con rocío a la espalda, bonitas, semitransparentes, diegéticas, simbólicas y preciosas, aparecen, digo, las flores. Dije.

Allí estuvo cuando las veo. Mi persona las ojeó. Pero detrás, y frente ocular, seguía el trasiego. Iban y venían y norte y sur. La rosa en la verja de los vientos, las espinas se clavaban a cada paso trasero. Iban y venían, no distinguía si anduvieron como siempre para atrás, o andarán para adelante. No lo sabía.forja

Pero allí estaré. Una gabardina, una guayabera, algún seno y sombreros de abajo arriba, este, oeste pero no distinguía más que su olor. Me verá. Pero está. Su presencia acallaba las sombras medio plazo y sonarán las doce. Calor. Estupor. Escalofrío, me pinchará.

El cauce inevitable brotó. Me contagió su bermejo color. Femenino en cursi, pitiminí y robusta me desafía y se crece hacia el hastío de allá, pasada la valla. Verja antes. Frente a mí me raspó la espalda, miré y me vi, vi la rosa, los pasos rodeaban mi aura y las espinas lloraban. No había tregua.

El jardín se perdió. Estaba allí. Murmuró humedad. No querrá molestar. Bombachos ajustados echan raíces con rebelión. Y no consintió. Lo veo, lo toqué, lo sentiré.


Allí estaba, entre flores, casonas con tacto exterior y elegancia e interior contacto, nobleza desfilaba. Focalicé y encuadré, y se descubrirá. Allí permanecía. Entre abanicos, galanterías, capullos, tabiques y muros, esencias, ponzoñas y encornaduras, armaduras y asonantas y puntos. Y puntas.

Y entre ellas, malabarista iconoclasta estaba él, no me sorprendió, el alambre, dije. Entrópico.flores


THE WIRE* (*Translation is difficult)

It wasn’t until yesterday. But tomorrow too. Today was and will be. The gate will already be there, and it was. Behind a XIX century house. I in the garden in front of me, a fence, not the fence.
Half hidden in the past and the serpentine flowers of the standing fence, they did not let me feel with my eyes the present of what will happen. I admired steps, hidden walkers, furtive, clandestine before me. Then clear, crystalline and opaque colors with dew on the back, beautiful, semi-transparent, diegetic, symbolic and precious, appear, I say the flowers. Said.
There it was when I see them. My person flipped through them. But behind, and eye front, followed the racking. They came and went and north and south. The rose in the gate of the winds, the thorns were nailed with each rear step. They came and went, he did not distinguish if they went back as always, or will go forward. I did not know, I did not know it.
But there I will be. A raincoat, a guayabera, some bosom and hats from bottom to top, east, west, but I could only distinguish its smell. Will see me. But this. His presence quieted the shadows mid-term and twelve will ring. Hot. Stupor. Chill, it will prick me.
The inevitable channel flowed out. Its vermilion color infected me. Feminine in cheesy, pitimini and robust it challenges to me and it grows towards the boredom of there, past the fence. Gate before. In front of me he scratched my back, I looked and I saw myself, I saw the rose, the footsteps surrounded my aura and the thorns wept. There was no truce.
The garden was lost. It was there. He murmured moisture. You don’t want to disturb. Tight bloomers take root with rebellion. And he did not consent. I see it, I touched it, I will feel it.
There it was, among flowers, large houses with an exterior touch and elegance and interior contact, nobility paraded. I focused and framed, and it will be discovered. There it remained. Among fans, gallantries, cocoons, partitions and walls, essences, poisons and enclosures, armor and asonantas and points. And tips.
And among them, iconoclastic juggler was he, I was not surprised, the wire, I said. Entropic.