COVID-19: Virus, asesinos y estrategias


Os traigo y recomiendo la lectura del último artículo escrito por Máximo Sandín Domínguez, de Abril de 2020. Doctor en Ciencias Biológicas y en Bioantropología.

Coronavirus: sobre virus, asesinos y estrategias.

Parece una obviedad afirmar que la crisis mundial que se ha desatado como consecuencia de la pandemia producida por el covid 19 no tiene precedentes en la historia. Lo que no es tan evidente es porqué si esta pandemia se produce como se afirma desde el ámbito científico, es decir, por el “salto” espontáneo del virus de algún animal al hombre, no se han producido continuamente epidemias de origen viral a lo lago de la historia.

En cualquier caso, esta situación ha originado un consenso social sobre las causas y consecuencias de la “aparición del coronavirus” generado por una abrumadora y permanente avalancha de información por parte de todos los medios de comunicación. Los expertos, que aportan la voz de la Ciencia, nos hablan de un “virus asesino” pero que utiliza una perversa “estrategia”: no matar a todos los que infecta para poder seguir reproduciéndose.

Sin embargo, la atribución de cualidades, incluso de intenciones a un ente biológico que en estado libre es inerte, a una molécula de ADN o (en este caso) de ARN empaquetado con una densidad casi cristalina en una cápsida proteica envuelta en una capa de lípidos, un ente que no se puede considerar un ser vivo, produce una cierta desconfianza en estas interpretaciones científicas por muy prestigiosos que sean sus emisores. Pero lo que lleva la desconfianza al límite de la sospecha es cuando la prestigiosa revista científica Nature (Nature Medicine 17 de marzo) publica un artículo en el que concluye que el virus covid 19 “no es un virus obtenido en un laboratorio o manipulado a propósito”, un estupor que puede equivaler al producido porque en una revista de astrofísica se publicase un artículo destinado a demostrar que la Tierra no es plana.

Siga leyendo el artículo aquí.

Este artículo avala varias teorías que desencadenan en una, que a la vez se abre en racimos.

Os dejo también la web del Doctor Sandín: Somos bacterias y virus.

I bring you and recommend reading the last article written by Máximo Sandín Domínguez on April 2020. Doctor in Biological Sciences and Bioanthropology.

This article endorses several theories that trigger one, which at the same time opens in clusters.

Coronavirus: about viruses, killers and strategies.

Máximo Sandín.

It seems obvious that the world crisis that has been unleashed as a consequence of the pandemic caused by the covid 19 is unprecedented in history. What is not so evident is why if this pandemic occurs as claimed from the scientific field, that is, by the spontaneous “jump” of the virus from an animal to man, there have not been continuous epidemics of viral origin to the lake of history.
In any case, this situation has given rise to a social consensus on the causes and consequences of the “appearance of the coronavirus” generated by an overwhelming and permanent avalanche of information by all the media. The experts, who contribute the voice of Science, tell us about a “murderous virus” but that uses a perverse “strategy”: not to kill everyone it infects in order to continue reproducing.
However, the attribution of qualities, even of intentions, to a biological entity that is inert in the free state, to a DNA molecule or (in this case) RNA packed with an almost crystalline density in a protein casid wrapped in a layer of Lipids, an entity that cannot be considered a living being, produces a certain distrust in these scientific interpretations, however prestigious their emitters may be. But what brings mistrust to the limit of suspicion is when the prestigious scientific journal Nature (Nature Medicine March 17) publishes an article in which it concludes that the covid 19 virus “is not a virus obtained in a laboratory or manipulated on purpose ”, A stupor that can be equivalent to that produced because an article was published in an astrophysics magazine to demonstrate that the Earth is not flat.

The question that arises is why is such a prestigious magazine dedicated to contradicting a supposed infusion that should not even be taken into account scientifically because it comes from the field of what is usually described as “conspiranoic”?
Although in the current situation it may not seem appropriate to question official information, given that the priority is to end the pandemic, it never hurts (it may be essential) to understand why it occurred, so I suggest to the reader that I Join us to try to dispel these concerns by resorting to scientific data, that is, not interpretations, that allow us to get an idea of ​​what is happening.
The information that reaches the general public is based, fundamentally, on explanations and opinions of experts that are supposed to be believed on the basis of the principle of authority. In our case, I want the reader to draw his own conclusions from the data that I am going to present. In order to facilitate this work, I am not going to use bibliographic references that make it necessary to verify the affirmations by looking for the cited articles, but, directly, by copying the covers of those articles. (For the covers, go to the original pdf).

Let’s see then: The number of bacteria on Earth has been calculated to be approximately one nonillion (that is, one followed by thirty zeros). Well, it is estimated that the number of viruses is between five and twenty-five times the number of bacteria. As you will see, viruses or entities like viruses ”have played an important role in the evolution of life. But this is a long story. We will limit ourselves in this case to its ecological function:

Up to 10 billion viruses per liter have been counted in surface marine waters. Its function is to control the base of the marine trophic network. Since viruses are inert and passively move, when colonies of bacteria and algae grow excessively, being able to prevent the passage of the sun’s rays to the seabed, viruses destroy them until their density makes it possible for them to pass. Sun rays. Incidentally, the sulfurous products derived from this process contribute to the nucleation of the clouds.
Let’s see on the floors (excuse the size of the letters):

In the soils their number is variable, in all astronomical cases. In this study they have shown average figures of 5.3-10e8 and they are also involved in the control of bacterial communities.
Regarding its presence in organisms, it is considered that 10% of the human genome is made up of endogenous retroviruses, that is, viruses that throughout their evolution have inserted their gene sequences into our genome. But if we take into account the sequences derived from viruses (mobile elements such as transposons and retrotrasposons, repeated short and long elements, introns …) we find that the vast majority of our genomes are made up of viruses and their derivatives that control the expression of protein coding genes.

But, what is more, what was considered the genome, that is, the protein coding genes, which constitute 1.5% of the entire genome, is made up of viruses and their derivatives:

As a curiosity, in case it is interesting to someone, I will point out that in this article the candid author does not explain why the genome sequences derived from viruses are removed “by someone” from public databases:

But our organism not only contains viruses in the form of sequences inserted into the chromosomes. The number of complete viruses that perform essential functions for our organism is of such a size that it surprises the researchers themselves. Billions (rather billions) of bacterial viruses coexist with the billions of bacteria in our intestinal tract that are essential to our lives. Bacteriophages or phages regulate bacterial populations and exchange genetic information between them. That is, viruses control bacteria that control our body.
Any other viruses? Let’s see:

A huge number of bacteriophages attached to the mucosa of the body prevent external bacteria from penetrating, which should not be there, that is, they also protect our body.
If I have an opinion, it seems like something has been wrong with the viruses. With the condition of the viruses when they were discovered associated with diseases. But, let’s look at some of those associations:

According to this article, breast cancer emits retroviral particles. Endogenous viruses are known to be able to jump out of the genome in the face of some form of environmental aggression. That is why, on many occasions, viruses have been identified as the causative agent of different diseases when in reality they are a consequence. And that is why, in the diseased tissues, the presence of viral particles is observed.

And thus, a viral origin has been suggested for diseases such as arthritis or schizophrenia, despite the fact that an epidemic of these diseases has never been reported.

Endogenous viruses have long been known to be expressed as a constituent of genomes, that is, they are the genome. This fact is of great importance for the subject at hand. Endogenous retroviruses or parts of them are expressed in such important processes as production of fundamental enzymes or the formation of the placenta during pregnancy.

These findings tell us about the fundamental role that viruses play in life processes, but what is the relationship of these phenomena to the subject at hand? We will see that it is a relationship of enormous importance, so I ask you to pay the most attention to the following two articles:

A multitude of endogenous retroviruses are expressed (involved in development) in embryonic tissues. As you can see, they are expressed in the placenta, adrenal cortex, kidneys, tongue, heart, liver, and central nervous system, as well as in the rest of the tissues. But let’s see in adult tissues:

In normal adult individuals, endogenous retroviruses are expressed in all tissues confirming that they are permanent components of the human transcriptome.

And now, let’s see how certain vaccines have been manufactured:

On the website of the INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND MANUFATURERS & ASSOCIATIONS the following information was very proud:

Do not look for it, because it has disappeared from the web. And for good reason, because cultivating human viruses in embryos of other animals in which a multitude of endogenous viruses are expressed, leads to hybridizations with their corresponding viruses, which produces infectious viruses with characteristics different from the original ones.
We have long been informed that seasonal flu came “from birds” and that it “mutated” each year, quite possibly with the development of each new vaccine. With each new hybridization.
For example, in this yellow fever vaccine:

These terrible consequences of dangerous practices can be considered the result of ignorance of relatively recent discoveries. Therefore, unintentional. Let me explain some practices carried out with perfect knowledge of what was being done and that I leave to your interpretation:

Perhaps the reader wonders what is the point of resuscitating a virus that caused nearly fifty million deaths? A virus that did not “emerge” in Spain, despite the fact that it was called “Spanish flu” with the intention of concealing the mortality it caused in soldiers at the end of the First World War, because in our country the state of epidemic was declared .
But its origin was, apparently, in the American soldiers. Some time ago I came across this information that, despite not coming from “official” channels, is consistent with what we have seen previously;

If this is the case, it would be the result of the ignorance of the existing viruses in the substrates and of the methods used to make vaccines, which in the case of the initial ones were very rudimentary and dangerous.
But in the following case, it is evident that it is not ignorance. The excuse that it is a question of determining its virulence is not credible. The two previous pandemic outbreaks that did not become pandemic were those caused by “bird flu” or H5N1, which resulted in high mortality but was difficult to transmit, and then H1N1 “swine flu”, which was easily transmitted but not very virulent. The letters H and N refer to hematoglutinin, a protein that is a component of the blood clotting system, and to neuramidase, an enzyme that controls the formation and maintenance of the myelin sheath of neurons, which form the virus virus capsid. flu.
And now an innocent experiment:

Let’s take a closer look at the consequences of this “experiment”:

It turns out that the characteristics of the porcine virus (H1N1) have a high antigenic similarity ”with the reconstructed human virus 1918 (H1N1). The explanation is that they “possibly share a common ancestor” as if viruses were going around the world getting married (or forming common-law partners).
The explanations for the “appearance” of the covid 19 are of the same scientific level: “It probably passed from a pangolin to the man through a bat, but it is not certain …” I hope that the reader has enough data to deduce another form of “appearance ”Of the coronavirus.
Well: there seems to be enough information to understand how covid 19 was produced. About the authors and their intentions you will have to investigate.

Villalbilla, April 2020

I also leave here the website of Doctor Sandín: We are bacteria and viruses.







Voy a intentar sintetizar lo que expongo en anteriores escritos. Nunca los vuelvo a leer, y créanme, a veces ni me acuerdo de lo que escribo, pero la base, los puntos cardinales, siguen ahí.

  1. El SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) ha podido ser manipulado en un laboratorio. O no. Da igual, es lo de menos. Si te voy a lanzar una bomba atómica y se fehacientemente que te va a caer un meteorito de forma natural, espero a que la naturaleza me haga las cosas más fáciles. De esta forma no hay ni criminales ni testigos.
  2. La deuda mundial es impagable. La élite de la élite (los políticos no saben nada, si ocultan algo es la típica opacidad gubernamental digamos, de segundo o tercer nivel) tienen que cambiar el juego para seguir funcionando con nuevas reglas y nuevo escenario.
  3. En estado de shock necesitamos “vacunas” mentales, en plural, somos más manipulables y encajamos las piezas que nos manden como el mejor jugador de Tetris.
  4. No sabemos qué pasará. Lo aceptaremos, o no. Y las consecuencias de ambos actos.

Con estos cuatro puntos ya se puede jugar al monopolio. Hay dinero, cosas que comprar y gente que expulsar. rosa_de_los_vientos_2

Puede que el punto 1 y el 2 no estén interconectados en un principio pero se da una ósmosis que absorben en cascada a los cuatro en uno solo. En una rosa, la de los vientos. Frescos.

De momento tomen el sol durante 20 minutos, vitaminas C y D.



I am going to try to synthesize what I expose in previous writings. I never read them again, and believe me, sometimes I don’t even remember what I write, but the base, the cardinal points, are still there.
1) SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) has been manipulated in a laboratory. Or not. Never mind, it’s the least of it. If I am going to drop an atomic bomb on you and I know that a meteor is going to fall naturally, I hope that nature makes things easier for me. In this way there are neither criminals nor witnesses.
2) World debt is unpayable. The elite of the elite (politicians don’t know anything, if they hide something is the typical government opacity, let’s say, second or third level) they have to change the game to continue operating with new rules and a new scenario.
3) In shock we need mental “shots”, in the plural, we are more manipulable and we fit the pieces that send us as the best Tetris player.
4) We don’t know what will happen. We will accept it or not. And the consequences of both acts.
With these four points you can already play monopoly. There is money, things to buy and people to expel.
Point 1 and 2 may not be interconnected at first, but an osmosis occurs that cascades absorb all four into one. In a rose, that of the winds. Fresh.

At the moment sunbathe for 20 minutes, vitamins C and D.





No fue hasta ayer. Pero mañana también. Hoy fue y será. La verja ya estará allí, y estaba. Atrás una casona del XIX. Yo en el jardín frente a mi, una verja, no la verja.

Medio escondido en el pasado y las flores serpentinas de la verja en pie, no me dejaban sentir con los ojos el presente de lo que pasará. Admiraba pasos, paseantes escondidos, furtivos, clandestinos ante yo. Entonces claras, cristalinas y opacas coloridas con rocío a la espalda, bonitas, semitransparentes, diegéticas, simbólicas y preciosas, aparecen, digo, las flores. Dije.

Allí estuvo cuando las veo. Mi persona las ojeó. Pero detrás, y frente ocular, seguía el trasiego. Iban y venían y norte y sur. La rosa en la verja de los vientos, las espinas se clavaban a cada paso trasero. Iban y venían, no distinguía si anduvieron como siempre para atrás, o andarán para adelante. No lo sabía.forja

Pero allí estaré. Una gabardina, una guayabera, algún seno y sombreros de abajo arriba, este, oeste pero no distinguía más que su olor. Me verá. Pero está. Su presencia acallaba las sombras medio plazo y sonarán las doce. Calor. Estupor. Escalofrío, me pinchará.

El cauce inevitable brotó. Me contagió su bermejo color. Femenino en cursi, pitiminí y robusta me desafía y se crece hacia el hastío de allá, pasada la valla. Verja antes. Frente a mí me raspó la espalda, miré y me vi, vi la rosa, los pasos rodeaban mi aura y las espinas lloraban. No había tregua.

El jardín se perdió. Estaba allí. Murmuró humedad. No querrá molestar. Bombachos ajustados echan raíces con rebelión. Y no consintió. Lo veo, lo toqué, lo sentiré.


Allí estaba, entre flores, casonas con tacto exterior y elegancia e interior contacto, nobleza desfilaba. Focalicé y encuadré, y se descubrirá. Allí permanecía. Entre abanicos, galanterías, capullos, tabiques y muros, esencias, ponzoñas y encornaduras, armaduras y asonantas y puntos. Y puntas.

Y entre ellas, malabarista iconoclasta estaba él, no me sorprendió, el alambre, dije. Entrópico.flores


THE WIRE* (*Translation is difficult)

It wasn’t until yesterday. But tomorrow too. Today was and will be. The gate will already be there, and it was. Behind a XIX century house. I in the garden in front of me, a fence, not the fence.
Half hidden in the past and the serpentine flowers of the standing fence, they did not let me feel with my eyes the present of what will happen. I admired steps, hidden walkers, furtive, clandestine before me. Then clear, crystalline and opaque colors with dew on the back, beautiful, semi-transparent, diegetic, symbolic and precious, appear, I say the flowers. Said.
There it was when I see them. My person flipped through them. But behind, and eye front, followed the racking. They came and went and north and south. The rose in the gate of the winds, the thorns were nailed with each rear step. They came and went, he did not distinguish if they went back as always, or will go forward. I did not know, I did not know it.
But there I will be. A raincoat, a guayabera, some bosom and hats from bottom to top, east, west, but I could only distinguish its smell. Will see me. But this. His presence quieted the shadows mid-term and twelve will ring. Hot. Stupor. Chill, it will prick me.
The inevitable channel flowed out. Its vermilion color infected me. Feminine in cheesy, pitimini and robust it challenges to me and it grows towards the boredom of there, past the fence. Gate before. In front of me he scratched my back, I looked and I saw myself, I saw the rose, the footsteps surrounded my aura and the thorns wept. There was no truce.
The garden was lost. It was there. He murmured moisture. You don’t want to disturb. Tight bloomers take root with rebellion. And he did not consent. I see it, I touched it, I will feel it.
There it was, among flowers, large houses with an exterior touch and elegance and interior contact, nobility paraded. I focused and framed, and it will be discovered. There it remained. Among fans, gallantries, cocoons, partitions and walls, essences, poisons and enclosures, armor and asonantas and points. And tips.
And among them, iconoclastic juggler was he, I was not surprised, the wire, I said. Entropic.





Aquí os dejo un interesante artículo del Doctor Jiménez-Clavero de su blog virus emergentes. El artículo tiene fecha de abril de 2012. Trata de la posibilidad real de virus emergentes de laboratorio.

El debate sobre la investigación de doble uso: se levanta la “censura” sobre las publicaciones acerca de la transmisión de virus H5N1 entre mamíferos.

Here I leave you an interesting article by Doctor Jiménez-Clavero from his blog emerging viruses. The article is dated April 2012. It deals with the real possibility of emerging laboratory viruses.



Pululan por doquier teorías conspirativas llamadas ikeanianas. Te haces de una mesa, una estantería y una cómoda de Ikea y montas una litera. Sabemos qué le va a pasar a la litera cuando subas a descansar, lo que no quita que si volvemos a desmontarla y juntar las piezas de cada mueble, vuelvan a ser de nuevo, y sirvan para lo que son, una mesa, estantería y una cómoda.

Anda por ahí una teoría con nombre de cruzada anglosajona que no se mantiene en pie en su conjunto, pero que aisladas, aun siendo perogrulladas, puedan contener como toda conjetura o hipótesis, algo de verdad, pero ni mucho menos, que es lo que pretende, convertirse en litera.

Esta teoría tiene cuatro patas: 1) Israel ataca a Irán con digamos, “pequeñas” bombas nucleares para ir haciendo aperitivo. 2) Se esparce por China un virus, guerra bacteriológica. 3) Con el caos y la supuesta debilidad de China, empieza una verdadera, pero con cierto control, guerra nuclear. Quien salga menos debilitado de todo esto, ganará la guerra. 4) Todo esto se adelanta por una inminente catástrofe natural y se saltan el punto uno.

Bien, la última ya puede inutilizar a todas las demás. Pero vayamos por partes. Como ven las cuatro son unos muebles bien hermosos pero no hacen un salón. Para qué vas a lanzar algo, si viene gratis del cielo.

Hay que decir también que la III Guerra Mundial ha comenzado. Seamos valientes, no tengan miedo, sólo el necesario para sobrevivir. ¿Por qué digo esto? Porque da igual que lo que ha pasado en China con el coronavirus sea natural o artificial. De las dos potencias, la que salga ganadora y reforzada de esto, habrá ganado la contienda. Con lo cual, estamos en guerra y es mundial.


Desmontemos la litera. El punto uno puede pasar desde 1979, y cualquiera que sepa un poco de geopolítica es tan plausible como que todos nos vamos a resfriar alguna vez.

El punto dos es el más interesante por obvio. Se divide en tres: a) China ha sido atacada con un virus. Su rápida actuación, contención y propagación mundial ha desconcertado al enemigo. China ha ganado esta batalla, la guerra ya se verá. b) China, a sabiendas que iba a ser atacada con un virus, se ha adelantado y ha soltado el suyo propio, sabiendo que lo iba a contener y que se iba a propagar como se está viendo a nivel mundial. Desconcertando e inactivando al enemigo, China también ha ganado esta batalla. c) El virus se ha desencadenado de forma natural. Se sabe que las pandemias del SARS se iban a dar cada diez o doce años, esperar a que saliera de la naturaleza un virus como este era cuestión de tiempo. ¿Para qué voy a lanzar una bomba si me va a caer del cielo gratis?, vuelvo a decir. Y no tiene importancia que el virus empiece en tu país. Posiblemente puedas controlarlo mejor si sabías que las tres hipótesis podían pasar. China también en este caso ha ganado la batalla.

El punto tres es una mesa.

El cuatro es una estantería muy barroca.

Hay que decir que la II Guerra Mundial en sí, no fue la que cambió el modo de vida del siglo XX. Sí lo fue la energía nuclear, sus consecuencias y relación con respecto a la geopolítica.

En este caso, tampoco lo va a ser la guerra en sí, sino el arma que va a cambiar el sistema al menos en setenta años. Y son los virus y su aprehensión en relación a la actitud vital de los gobiernos. Esto es, nadie va a comunicar que ha desatado una guerra bacteriológica, pues ya pierde la guerra antes de apretar el gatillo.

Las dos grandes potencias en realidad no se van a acusar de que el enemigo lo ha atacado con un virus. El motivo es que el virus prácticamente sería el mismo, con lo cual sería poco demostrable a nivel científico y lo más difícil, a nivel comunicacional entre gobernantes y pueblo. ¡Me han atacado pero yo estaba preparado para atacar con un virus mucho peor! Como comprenderán, esto no es asumible por el hombre de a pie. Esto es, perderíamos todos, y da igual en el bando que nos encontremos, el hombre medio no lo entendería y los ejércitos en cantidad quedarían inmovilizados por cuenta propia, no lucharían por el gobierno que los va a matar.

Es por esto que todo ha empezado, en silencio. Por ahora. asomado

¿Y qué hacemos? Nada. Bueno, lo que seguimos haciendo hasta ahora y por ahora. Es otra guerra. Una guerra comercial mundial con muertos. De momento, pongámonos a salvo como lo estamos haciendo.




There are everywhere conspiracy theories called IKEANIANAS. You get a table, a bookshelf and an IKEA chest of drawers and set up a bunk bed. We know what will happen to the bunk bed when you go up to rest, which does not mean that if we dismantle it again and put the pieces of each piece of furniture together, they will be again, and serve what they are, a table, a shelf and a chest of drawers.
There is a theory with the name of the Anglo-Saxon crusade that does not stand up as a whole, but that isolated, even if they are truisms, can contain, like any conjecture or hypothesis, some truth, but far from it, which is what it intends , become a bunk bed.
This theory has four legs: 1) Israel attacks Iran with, say, “small” nuclear bombs to make snacks. 2) A virus spreads throughout China, bacteriological warfare. 3) With the chaos and the supposed weakness of China, a true, but with some control, nuclear war begins. Whoever is least weakened from all this will win the war. 4) All this is advanced by an imminent natural catastrophe and skip point one.
Well, the last one can already disable all the others. But let’s go by parts. As you can see the four are very beautiful furniture but they do not make a living room. Why are you going to launch something, if it comes free from heaven.
It must also be said that World War III has begun. Let us be brave, do not be afraid, only what is necessary to survive. Why am I saying this? Because it does not matter that what has happened in China with the coronavirus is natural or artificial. Of the two powers, the winner and reinforced of this, will have won the contest. With which, we are at war and it is worldwide.
Let’s dismantle the bunk bed. Point one can go from 1979 and anyone who knows a little bit of geopolitics is as plausible as we are all going to catch a cold sometime.
Point two is the most interesting by obvious. It is divided into three: a) China has been attacked with a virus. Their swift action, containment, and global spread have baffled the enemy. China has won this battle, the war will be seen. b) China, knowing that it was going to be attacked with a virus, has gone ahead and released its own, knowing that it would contain it and that it would spread as it is being seen worldwide. By baffling and inactivating the enemy, China has also won this battle. c) The virus has been triggered naturally. It is known that the SARS pandemics were to occur every ten or twelve years, waiting for a virus like this to come out of nature was a matter of time. Why am I going to drop a bomb if it’s going to fall from the sky for free? I say again. And it doesn’t matter that the virus starts in your country. Possibly you can control it better if you knew that all three hypotheses could pass. China in this case too has won the battle.
Point three is a table.
The four is a very baroque bookcase.
It must be said that World War II itself was not the one that changed the way of life of the 20th century. Yes, nuclear energy was, its consequences and relationship with respect to geopolitics.
In this case, neither is the war itself, but the weapon that will change the system in at least seventy years. And they are viruses and their apprehension in relation to the vital attitude of governments. That is, no one is going to communicate that he has unleashed a bacteriological war, since he already loses the war before pulling the trigger.
The two great powers are not really going to accuse that the enemy has attacked him with a virus. The reason is that the virus would be practically the same, with which it would be unprovable scientifically and, more difficult, at the communicational level between rulers and people. I have been attacked but I was prepared to attack with a much worse virus! As you will understand, this is not acceptable for ordinary man. That is, we would all lose, and it does not matter on which side we are, the average man would not understand it and the armies in quantity would be immobilized on their own, they would not fight for the government that is going to kill them.
This is why everything has started, in silence. For now.
And what do we do? Nothing. Well, what we continue to do so far and for now. It is another war. A world trade war with the dead. For now, let’s get to safety as we are doing.
Take care of yourselves.




¡ES LA GUERRA! Entropía casera


Hoy es un día de esos. Estás en blanco. Lo he intentado por todos los medios. Escribiré de tristezas o realidades porque no me sale nada alegre. Intento regocijar pero el teclado me dice que me vaya a acostar. Imposible o nada, elige. ¿Puedo elegir elegir? Ni me contestan, qué más da.

El espejo me ha dicho que no me quiere ver, por cansino. Sigo mi camino. Y María, que no existe, me ha dicho (también) que me ponga a cocinar, que haga escritura entrópica, esto es, no lo sé.

Mi perro me habla y esta vez le contesto. El café se derrama, el sol ilumina y mi pie ladra. Los segundos se atrasan y las horas se adelantan, y el reloj, sumergido en el agua, flota. En la ventana hay alguien. Pero vivo en un tercero y es la tercera vez que me dicen (otra vez) que me acueste. ventana

Me acuesto y la sábana, cruel, me dice que la deje en paz, que la plancha está fría. El calor me sube, y el frío también, pero no es fiebre. La veo, y con desprecio se va, no me abandona porque no me ha llegado a poseer. No empieces que te veo, me dice un dicho. Le he dicho al dicho que qué tal, que qué, es lo único que he recibido por respuesta y no más propuestas.

Quedo yo. ¿Cómo estás? Y no me contesto. Mala cosa. Ni siquiera hay eco.

Y es que hoy iba a escribir algo grande. Busqué “El Arte de la Guerra” de Sun Tzu, escrito hace 22 millones se horas. Y me dije, voy a componer sobre la similitud encriptada de la actualidad y este clásico de la literatura china y universal. Y no me ha dicho que:

Todo el mundo elogia la victoria en la batalla, pero lo verdaderamente deseable es poder ver el mundo de lo sutil y darte cuenta del mundo de lo oculto, hasta el punto de ser capaz de alcanzar la victoria donde no existe forma. sun_tzu

¿Entonces? ¡Que esta batalla la vamos a ganar!

— ¿Alguien no me contesta?

— ¿Merluzo! — dicen por ahí .

— ¡¿Ahora hay eco?!

— ¡Soy yo, el perro!

— ¡Pues cierra la ventana y dile a mi reflejo que se vaya por el espejo, que voy a hacer lentejas!

— ¡Guau, guau! — Volvió a sonar el eco…



Today’s one of those days. You are blank. I have tried by all means. I will write about sadness or realities because nothing happy comes out. I try to rejoice but the keyboard tells me to go to bed. Impossible or nothing, choose. Can I choose to choose? They don’t even answer me, what difference does it make?
The mirror has told me that he does not want to see me, because he is tired. I follow my path. And Maria, who doesn’t exist, has told me (also) to start cooking, to do entropic writing, that is, I don’t know.
My dog ​​talks to me and this time I answer him. Coffee spills, the sun shines and my foot barks. The seconds are lagging and the hours are ticking, and the watch, submerged in water, floats. Someone is in the window. But I live in a third party and it is the third time that they tell me (again) to go to bed.
I lie down and the sheet, cruel, tells me to leave it alone, that the iron is cold. The heat rises, and the cold also, but it is not a fever. I see her, and with contempt she leaves, she does not abandon me because she has not come to possess me. Don’t start seeing you, a saying tells me. I have said to the saying that how about, what, is the only thing I have received for an answer and no more proposals.
I remain. How are you? And I do not answer. Bad thing. There is not even an echo.
And is that today I was going to write something big. I looked up “The Art of War” by Sun Tzu, written 22 million hours ago. And I said to myself, I’m going to write about the encrypted similarity of today and this classic of Chinese and universal literature. And you haven’t told me that:
Everyone praises victory in battle, but what is truly desirable is being able to see the world of the subtle and realize the world of the hidden, to the point of being able to achieve victory where there is no way.
So? We are going to win this battle!
— Does anyone not answer me?
— Hake! — they say over there.
— Is there an echo now ?!
— It’s me, the dog!
— Well, close the window and tell my reflection to go through the mirror, I’m going to make lentils!
— Woof, woof! — The echo sounded again …



¡Lo que estamos aprendiendo sobre virus! El COVID-19 es primo hermano del resfriado común, pasa que aún  no estamos inmunizados, ese es el problema y la causa de la pandemia. Mírenlo de esta manera, las formas de contagiarse entre el resfriado y el COVID-19 son las mismas, pero hagan un esfuerzo mental, si te resfrías, puedes morir.

Una metáfora sería, dos pistolas de la misma marca, una dispara fogueo (resfriado común), la otra dispara balas (COVID-19), unos tienen chalecos antibalas y otros no, pero el calibre utilizado, a veces, incluso traspasa los chalecos antibalas. Cuando estemos inmunizados, todos llevaremos chalecos reforzados, a muy pocos, quizá por defectos de este, fallecerán. Dicho esto, empiezo la retahíla.

La literatura que genera el coronavirus es altamente voluble, incluso anfibia, andando por fronteras que no quieres cruzar, naturales o artificiales, mentales e incluso morales. Y de esta última posiblemente, vaya este escrito.

El coronavirus COVID-19 parece un virus a la carta ¿Pero a la carta de quién? ¿O para quién? ¿Y para qué? Con una simple búsqueda por hemerotecas (por supuesto, digitales) y con principio de aleatoriedad, nos echamos la mochila al hombro, adquirimos un billete de tren y viajamos dejando atrás aduanas. Haré un resumen:deuda_mundial

La deuda pública mundial es impagable, en relación con el tamaño de la economía mundial, el volumen de deuda acumulado a nivel global equivale al 320% del PIB.

Los gobiernos tienen poco margen fiscal debido a la situación actual de la deuda.  Desde el punto de vista monetario, los bancos centrales han iniciado el camino del endurecimiento. La próxima recesión será más pronunciada que en ocasiones precedentes.

Un nivel de apalancamiento jamás visto desde la II Guerra Mundial es una bomba de relojería que puede estallar en cualquier momento.

Los países desarrollados se enfrentan al envejecimiento de sus poblaciones. Cada vez hay más jubilados que personas activas y eso significa ingresos fiscales menores. Cuando un gobierno recauda menos, pero sus compromisos son mayores, una solución fácil al problema está en la emisión de más deuda. En este sentido, los ratios de deuda son considerablemente más altos cuando se incluyen los compromisos de gasto adquiridos en pensiones y salud. jubilado

¿Qué quiero decir?. Las guerras mundiales ya no cuelan, y además el target de los muertos en estas catástrofes no son los convenientes para resolver futuros problemas del dinero. Este dinero no es el billete que vemos en la calle, común, ordinario, es el del control, el del que todo cambie para que todo siga igual, a escala crema de la élite.

Me ha llamado la atención que un recién nacido de madre infectada por COVID-19 no ha sido infectado.

¿Se imaginan esta conversación?

– Hay que resetear. Necesito un virus a la carta. Debe afectar a personas envejecidas. – Se hará, pero es imposible que sólo afecte a jubilados. – Pero que el daño baje en proporción y letalidad mientras la edad sea menor. Los necesito.

Cuídense. coronavirus_1



What we are learning about viruses! COVID-19 is the first cousin of the common cold, it happens that we are not yet immunized, that is the problem and the cause of the pandemic. Look at it this way, the ways of catching cold and COVID-19 are the same, but make a mental effort, if you catch a cold, you can die.
One metaphor would be, two pistols of the same brand, one shoots blank (common cold), the other shoots bullets (COVID-19), some have bulletproof vests and others do not, but the caliber used, sometimes, even goes beyond bulletproof vests . When we are immunized, we will all wear reinforced vests, very few, perhaps due to its defects, will die. With that said, I begin the string.
The literature that generates the coronavirus is highly fickle, even amphibious, walking through borders that you don’t want to cross, natural or artificial, mental and even moral. And of the latter possibly, this writing goes.
The coronavirus COVID-19 looks like a virus on demand. But whose letter? Or for whom? And for what? With a simple search through newspaper archives (of course, digital) and with a principle of randomness, we put our backpack on our shoulders, bought a train ticket and traveled, leaving customs behind. I will make a summary:
World public debt is unpayable, in relation to the size of the world economy, the volume of debt accumulated globally is equivalent to 320% of GDP.
Governments have little fiscal margin due to the current debt situation. From a monetary point of view, central banks have started on the path of tightening. The next recession will be more pronounced than on previous occasions.
A level of leverage never seen since World War II is a time bomb that can explode at any time.
Developed countries face aging populations. There are more and more retirees than active people and that means lower tax income. When a government collects less, but its commitments are greater, an easy solution to the problem is in the issuance of more debt. In this sense, the debt ratios are considerably higher when the spending commitments acquired in pensions and health are included.
What do I mean? World wars no longer creep in, and also the target of those killed in these catastrophes is not convenient for solving future money problems. This money is not the banknote that we see on the street, ordinary, ordinary, it is that of the control, that of which everything changes so that everything remains the same, on an elite cream scale.
It has come to my attention that a newborn born to a mother infected with COVID-19 has not been infected.
Can you imagine this conversation?
– We must reset. I need a virus on demand. It must affect aged people. – It will be done, but it is impossible that it only affects retirees. – But that the damage falls in proportion and lethality while the age is younger. I need them.
Take care of yourselves.