COVID-19: Virus, asesinos y estrategias

covid-19

Os traigo y recomiendo la lectura del último artículo escrito por Máximo Sandín Domínguez, de Abril de 2020. Doctor en Ciencias Biológicas y en Bioantropología.

Coronavirus: sobre virus, asesinos y estrategias.

Parece una obviedad afirmar que la crisis mundial que se ha desatado como consecuencia de la pandemia producida por el covid 19 no tiene precedentes en la historia. Lo que no es tan evidente es porqué si esta pandemia se produce como se afirma desde el ámbito científico, es decir, por el “salto” espontáneo del virus de algún animal al hombre, no se han producido continuamente epidemias de origen viral a lo lago de la historia.

En cualquier caso, esta situación ha originado un consenso social sobre las causas y consecuencias de la “aparición del coronavirus” generado por una abrumadora y permanente avalancha de información por parte de todos los medios de comunicación. Los expertos, que aportan la voz de la Ciencia, nos hablan de un “virus asesino” pero que utiliza una perversa “estrategia”: no matar a todos los que infecta para poder seguir reproduciéndose.

Sin embargo, la atribución de cualidades, incluso de intenciones a un ente biológico que en estado libre es inerte, a una molécula de ADN o (en este caso) de ARN empaquetado con una densidad casi cristalina en una cápsida proteica envuelta en una capa de lípidos, un ente que no se puede considerar un ser vivo, produce una cierta desconfianza en estas interpretaciones científicas por muy prestigiosos que sean sus emisores. Pero lo que lleva la desconfianza al límite de la sospecha es cuando la prestigiosa revista científica Nature (Nature Medicine 17 de marzo) publica un artículo en el que concluye que el virus covid 19 “no es un virus obtenido en un laboratorio o manipulado a propósito”, un estupor que puede equivaler al producido porque en una revista de astrofísica se publicase un artículo destinado a demostrar que la Tierra no es plana.

Siga leyendo el artículo aquí.

Este artículo avala varias teorías que desencadenan en una, que a la vez se abre en racimos.

Os dejo también la web del Doctor Sandín: Somos bacterias y virus.

I bring you and recommend reading the last article written by Máximo Sandín Domínguez on April 2020. Doctor in Biological Sciences and Bioanthropology.

This article endorses several theories that trigger one, which at the same time opens in clusters.

Coronavirus: about viruses, killers and strategies.

Máximo Sandín.

It seems obvious that the world crisis that has been unleashed as a consequence of the pandemic caused by the covid 19 is unprecedented in history. What is not so evident is why if this pandemic occurs as claimed from the scientific field, that is, by the spontaneous “jump” of the virus from an animal to man, there have not been continuous epidemics of viral origin to the lake of history.
In any case, this situation has given rise to a social consensus on the causes and consequences of the “appearance of the coronavirus” generated by an overwhelming and permanent avalanche of information by all the media. The experts, who contribute the voice of Science, tell us about a “murderous virus” but that uses a perverse “strategy”: not to kill everyone it infects in order to continue reproducing.
However, the attribution of qualities, even of intentions, to a biological entity that is inert in the free state, to a DNA molecule or (in this case) RNA packed with an almost crystalline density in a protein casid wrapped in a layer of Lipids, an entity that cannot be considered a living being, produces a certain distrust in these scientific interpretations, however prestigious their emitters may be. But what brings mistrust to the limit of suspicion is when the prestigious scientific journal Nature (Nature Medicine March 17) publishes an article in which it concludes that the covid 19 virus “is not a virus obtained in a laboratory or manipulated on purpose ”, A stupor that can be equivalent to that produced because an article was published in an astrophysics magazine to demonstrate that the Earth is not flat.

The question that arises is why is such a prestigious magazine dedicated to contradicting a supposed infusion that should not even be taken into account scientifically because it comes from the field of what is usually described as “conspiranoic”?
Although in the current situation it may not seem appropriate to question official information, given that the priority is to end the pandemic, it never hurts (it may be essential) to understand why it occurred, so I suggest to the reader that I Join us to try to dispel these concerns by resorting to scientific data, that is, not interpretations, that allow us to get an idea of ​​what is happening.
The information that reaches the general public is based, fundamentally, on explanations and opinions of experts that are supposed to be believed on the basis of the principle of authority. In our case, I want the reader to draw his own conclusions from the data that I am going to present. In order to facilitate this work, I am not going to use bibliographic references that make it necessary to verify the affirmations by looking for the cited articles, but, directly, by copying the covers of those articles. (For the covers, go to the original pdf).

Let’s see then: The number of bacteria on Earth has been calculated to be approximately one nonillion (that is, one followed by thirty zeros). Well, it is estimated that the number of viruses is between five and twenty-five times the number of bacteria. As you will see, viruses or entities like viruses ”have played an important role in the evolution of life. But this is a long story. We will limit ourselves in this case to its ecological function:

Up to 10 billion viruses per liter have been counted in surface marine waters. Its function is to control the base of the marine trophic network. Since viruses are inert and passively move, when colonies of bacteria and algae grow excessively, being able to prevent the passage of the sun’s rays to the seabed, viruses destroy them until their density makes it possible for them to pass. Sun rays. Incidentally, the sulfurous products derived from this process contribute to the nucleation of the clouds.
Let’s see on the floors (excuse the size of the letters):

In the soils their number is variable, in all astronomical cases. In this study they have shown average figures of 5.3-10e8 and they are also involved in the control of bacterial communities.
Regarding its presence in organisms, it is considered that 10% of the human genome is made up of endogenous retroviruses, that is, viruses that throughout their evolution have inserted their gene sequences into our genome. But if we take into account the sequences derived from viruses (mobile elements such as transposons and retrotrasposons, repeated short and long elements, introns …) we find that the vast majority of our genomes are made up of viruses and their derivatives that control the expression of protein coding genes.

But, what is more, what was considered the genome, that is, the protein coding genes, which constitute 1.5% of the entire genome, is made up of viruses and their derivatives:

As a curiosity, in case it is interesting to someone, I will point out that in this article the candid author does not explain why the genome sequences derived from viruses are removed “by someone” from public databases:

But our organism not only contains viruses in the form of sequences inserted into the chromosomes. The number of complete viruses that perform essential functions for our organism is of such a size that it surprises the researchers themselves. Billions (rather billions) of bacterial viruses coexist with the billions of bacteria in our intestinal tract that are essential to our lives. Bacteriophages or phages regulate bacterial populations and exchange genetic information between them. That is, viruses control bacteria that control our body.
Any other viruses? Let’s see:

A huge number of bacteriophages attached to the mucosa of the body prevent external bacteria from penetrating, which should not be there, that is, they also protect our body.
If I have an opinion, it seems like something has been wrong with the viruses. With the condition of the viruses when they were discovered associated with diseases. But, let’s look at some of those associations:

According to this article, breast cancer emits retroviral particles. Endogenous viruses are known to be able to jump out of the genome in the face of some form of environmental aggression. That is why, on many occasions, viruses have been identified as the causative agent of different diseases when in reality they are a consequence. And that is why, in the diseased tissues, the presence of viral particles is observed.

And thus, a viral origin has been suggested for diseases such as arthritis or schizophrenia, despite the fact that an epidemic of these diseases has never been reported.

Endogenous viruses have long been known to be expressed as a constituent of genomes, that is, they are the genome. This fact is of great importance for the subject at hand. Endogenous retroviruses or parts of them are expressed in such important processes as production of fundamental enzymes or the formation of the placenta during pregnancy.

These findings tell us about the fundamental role that viruses play in life processes, but what is the relationship of these phenomena to the subject at hand? We will see that it is a relationship of enormous importance, so I ask you to pay the most attention to the following two articles:

A multitude of endogenous retroviruses are expressed (involved in development) in embryonic tissues. As you can see, they are expressed in the placenta, adrenal cortex, kidneys, tongue, heart, liver, and central nervous system, as well as in the rest of the tissues. But let’s see in adult tissues:

In normal adult individuals, endogenous retroviruses are expressed in all tissues confirming that they are permanent components of the human transcriptome.

And now, let’s see how certain vaccines have been manufactured:

On the website of the INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND MANUFATURERS & ASSOCIATIONS http://www.ifpma.org/influenza/index.aspx?47 the following information was very proud:

Do not look for it, because it has disappeared from the web. And for good reason, because cultivating human viruses in embryos of other animals in which a multitude of endogenous viruses are expressed, leads to hybridizations with their corresponding viruses, which produces infectious viruses with characteristics different from the original ones.
We have long been informed that seasonal flu came “from birds” and that it “mutated” each year, quite possibly with the development of each new vaccine. With each new hybridization.
For example, in this yellow fever vaccine:

These terrible consequences of dangerous practices can be considered the result of ignorance of relatively recent discoveries. Therefore, unintentional. Let me explain some practices carried out with perfect knowledge of what was being done and that I leave to your interpretation:

Perhaps the reader wonders what is the point of resuscitating a virus that caused nearly fifty million deaths? A virus that did not “emerge” in Spain, despite the fact that it was called “Spanish flu” with the intention of concealing the mortality it caused in soldiers at the end of the First World War, because in our country the state of epidemic was declared .
But its origin was, apparently, in the American soldiers. Some time ago I came across this information that, despite not coming from “official” channels, is consistent with what we have seen previously;

If this is the case, it would be the result of the ignorance of the existing viruses in the substrates and of the methods used to make vaccines, which in the case of the initial ones were very rudimentary and dangerous.
But in the following case, it is evident that it is not ignorance. The excuse that it is a question of determining its virulence is not credible. The two previous pandemic outbreaks that did not become pandemic were those caused by “bird flu” or H5N1, which resulted in high mortality but was difficult to transmit, and then H1N1 “swine flu”, which was easily transmitted but not very virulent. The letters H and N refer to hematoglutinin, a protein that is a component of the blood clotting system, and to neuramidase, an enzyme that controls the formation and maintenance of the myelin sheath of neurons, which form the virus virus capsid. flu.
And now an innocent experiment:

Let’s take a closer look at the consequences of this “experiment”:

It turns out that the characteristics of the porcine virus (H1N1) have a high antigenic similarity ”with the reconstructed human virus 1918 (H1N1). The explanation is that they “possibly share a common ancestor” as if viruses were going around the world getting married (or forming common-law partners).
The explanations for the “appearance” of the covid 19 are of the same scientific level: “It probably passed from a pangolin to the man through a bat, but it is not certain …” I hope that the reader has enough data to deduce another form of “appearance ”Of the coronavirus.
Well: there seems to be enough information to understand how covid 19 was produced. About the authors and their intentions you will have to investigate.

Villalbilla, April 2020

I also leave here the website of Doctor Sandín: We are bacteria and viruses.

 

 

 

 

LA PANDEMIA NO CUADRA

covid-19

Está, pero no cuadra. Intentaré ser muy escueto. Hay tres focos del coronavirus que no armonizan*.

  • CHINA: Estamos en el epicentro. Tres posibilidades. El virus lo ha creado la naturaleza. El virus lo ha creado el hombre y se le ha escapado a China. El virus ha sido creado por el hombre y agentes exteriores lo han extendido por China. (La rapidez con que China, real o aparentemente ha controlado la situación, sería una indicación de su potencia y un aviso a los que la han querido dañar).
  • ITALIA: Si quieres extender el virus por Europa, ¿Dónde lo dejarías? Una posible buena respuesta sería el norte de Italia. El salto de este virus de China a Italia no se mantiene en pie:

Europa es el tercer destino turístico más grande del mundo para los viajeros chinos, después de Asia y Oceanía. Francia es el primer destino. Italia aparece en el tercer o cuarto puesto. Esto contradice a la naturaleza en general y a la propagación de este virus en particular. Por contra y a nivel europeo podemos decir que esta región (Lombardía), está en el centro de Europa y los viajeros de vuelta describen un mosaico en forma de abanico.

  • IRÁN: Este es el caso que menos concuerda. Está cerca de China, pero lo normal es que el virus se expandiera por aquella zona en círculos concéntricos de dentro a fuera. Bien, los países fronterizos con China no han tenido un brote tan agresivo comparado con Irán. Imagínense este supuesto (en concordancia con todos los demás): En última instancia alguien obliga e insiste que este país sea una de los principales brotes. A alguien, geopolíticamente, le interesa.

mapa_coronavirus1

Sin más, dejo a los expertos estos supuestos que me atrevo a tocar por sentido común. El mal ya está hecho, pero con algunas particularidades e indicios. No creo que sea una “guerra” entre Estados, sino de una gran corporación y a la vez pequeña.

Y si todo esto no fuera así, que fuera todo natural, también saldría ganando esa corporación. ¿Entonces? Pues que todo tiene sentido… Y a la vez todo es un sinsentido.

* Esto es de julio de 2009, por tanto no “infectado” de alarmismo informativo respecto al coronavirus: Tal como señalan los expertos, las pandemias de influenza son eventos extraordinarios porque se propagan en poblaciones que son muy susceptibles a la infección. Y tal como ha quedado demostrado con el virus H1N1 (gripe porcina), la infección llega en epidemias similares a un “tsunami”. Como ven, una ola gigante se expande como ondas de agua, no dando saltos inexplicables para la naturaleza, o bien, hay varios tsunamis en dias posteriores. En el caso del coronavirus demuestra una activación antinatural de los principales focos.

Hablo del principio, del origen en el espacio y tiempo de la pandemia. Ahora, a día de hoy, puede haber efecto rebote.

En el continente americano, que el virus ha entrado de forma natural, se ve que hay un foco grande y se expande en forma de onda, no hay tres o cuatro focos de igual tamaño e importancia. tsunami
Me gustaría equivocarme.
Cuídense.

G.R.M.

THE PANDEMIC DOES NOT ADD UP

It is, but it doesn’t fit. I will try to be very concise. There are three foci of the coronavirus that don’t harmonize*.
– CHINA: We are at the epicenter. Three possibilities. The virus has been created by nature. The virus has been created by man and has escaped China. The virus has been created by man and external agents have spread it throughout China. (The speed with which China has, actually or apparently controlled the situation would be an indication of its strength and a warning to those who have wanted to harm it.)
– ITALY: If you want to spread the virus throughout Europe, where would you leave it? A possible good answer would be northern Italy. The jump of this virus from China to Italy does not remain standing:
Europe is the third largest tourist destination in the world for Chinese travelers, after Asia and Oceania. France is the first destination. Italy appears in third or fourth place. This contradicts nature in general and the spread of this virus in particular. By cons and at a European level we can say that this region (Lombardy) is in the center of Europe and the travelers back describe a mosaic in the shape of a fan.
– IRAN: This is the case that least agrees. It is close to China, but it is normal for the virus to spread in that area in concentric circles from the inside out. Well, the countries bordering China have not had such an aggressive outbreak compared to Iran. Imagine this assumption (in accordance with all the others): Ultimately someone forces and insists that this country be one of the main outbreaks. Someone, geopolitically, is interested.
Without further ado, I leave to the experts these assumptions that I dare to touch on common sense. The evil is already done, but with some peculiarities and indications. I do not think it is a “war” between States, but of a large and at the same time small corporation.
And if all this were not so, that it were all natural, that corporation would also win. So? Well, everything makes sense … And at the same time everything is nonsense.

* This is from July 2009, therefore not “infected” with informational alarmism regarding the coronavirus: As experts point out, influenza pandemics are extraordinary events because they spread in populations that are highly susceptible to infection. And as has been shown with the H1N1 virus (swine flu), the infection comes in epidemics similar to a “tsunami”. As you can see, a giant wave expands like water waves, not making inexplicable jumps for nature, or, there are several tsunamis in later days. In the case of the coronavirus, it shows an unnatural activation of the main foci.

I am talking about the beginning, the origin in space and time of the pandemic. Now, today, there may be a rebound effect.

In the American continent, that the virus has entered naturally, it is seen that there is a large focus and it expands in the form of a wave, there are not three or four foci of equal size and importance.
I wish I was wrong.
Take care of yourselves.

coronavirus_